CA9: No standing in an alien smuggling stash house

Defendant did not show sufficient evidence of standing to challenge the search of a place where smuggled aliens had stopped to rest, and he was with them. This was a commercial enterprise. United States v. Reyes-Bosque, 596 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2010).

Clear plastic baggie of drugs in plain view under the arm rest was probable cause for a search of the car. United States v. Jolly, 368 Fed. Appx. 17 (11th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

Defendant was not seized when the officer pulled him away out of the road. There was reasonable suspicion for a pat down from defendant’s admission he had a weapon, plus his suspicious conduct. United States v. Holloway, 367 Fed. Appx. 431 (4th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

We agree with the district court’s conclusion that Officer Catoggio did not “seize” Holloway. The district court credited Officer Catoggio’s testimony that Holloway was stepping into a traffic lane and he grabbed Holloway’s arm to protect him from moving vehicles. Given this evidence, the district court did not clearly err when it determined that Holloway was not “seized” at that juncture.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.