CA3: Plaintiff stated claim to overcome QI on false arrest claim

Officers were surveilling a bank that they anticipated would be robbed, and plaintiffs show up at the bank and were stopped at gunpoint as suspected bank robbers. Plaintiffs were there to deposit a paycheck, and the person who was the suspected bank robber was dressed different and nearly 200 lbs heavier than the person they were looking for. Taking the case most favorably to the plaintiffs on qualified immunity, they stated enough to get to trial for the unreasonable stop. Hopkins v. Vaughn, 363 Fed. Appx. 931 (3d Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

The stop in this case was valid for window tinting, and the conversation gave the officer reasonable suspicion. The defendant was told he could leave but that the officer wanted to search the car, and the defendant consented. United States v. Hanson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7903 (N.D. Iowa February 1, 2010).*

Defendant was a momentary passenger in a vehicle stopped with probable cause for a traffic offense, so he lacked standing to contest the search. He had standing, of course, to contest the stop. United States v. Henderson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7710 (W.D. La. January 5, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.