Relevance of a Jesus Malverde statute

Not a Fourth Amendment case, but a relevance issue in drug cases: Was there prejudice from testimony about a Jesus Malverde statute? United States v. Valencia, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 21659 (8th Cir. Aug. 6, 2018)*:

The evidentiary dispute concerns a portrait of Jesus Malverde that was part of a larger shrine of religious icons located in the living room of Valencia’s home. At trial, two experienced narcotics investigators testified about the significance of Jesus Malverde imagery. One testified that an image of Jesus Malverde is “considered good luck” for narcotics dealers, and that the presence of such imagery would be circumstantial evidence that a location was associated with drug trafficking. Another explained that it was “folklore” that Jesus Malverde is “a patron saint of drug dealers.” He opined that the presence of a Jesus Malverde image in a residence-along with methamphetamine and large amounts of cash-would lead him to believe it likely that someone in the household was involved in drug distribution. The witnesses also acknowledged, however, that the presence of Jesus Malverde imagery by itself would not establish drug trafficking activity, and one officer confirmed that Malverde was venerated by many people other than drug dealers.

Or this drug defense lawyer who has one in his office. I doubt any clients get it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.