E.D.Mich.: Minor testimonial inconsistencies in testimony about a trash pull did not mean no PC

Minor testimonial inconsistencies in testimony about a trash pull did not mean there was no probable cause. United States v. Gershwin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77029 (E.D. Mich. May 8, 2018).

“Taken with Arguelles’s sex offender status, which included a prior conviction for possession of child pornography on an electronic device, as well as repeated violations of the sex offender registration requirements, it was fairly probable that the ‘underage’ folder on his cell phone contained pornographic material involving underage children.” United States v. Arguelles, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77132 (N.D. Fla. May 8, 2018).

This entry was posted in Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.