DE: No REP in recorded jail calls [obviously]

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not objecting to defendant’s jail calls that he knew were monitored and recorded. Hubbard v. State, 2018 Del. LEXIS 34 (Jan. 25, 2018).*

A drug raid led to a strip search of defendant in the house with 2 grams of cocaine found in his “butt cheeks,” and neither the search warrant nor the strip search is an issue on appeal. State v. Linsey, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 49 (Jan. 25, 2018).*

Defendant’s “particularity challenge is utterly without merit.” So is the alleged lack of probable cause for the search warrant. United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12284 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 25, 2018);* United States v. Rangel, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12274 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 25, 2018); United States v. Rangel-Rubio, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12277 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 25, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.