D.Kan.: Conflicts in govt’s testimony doesn’t support its claim of consent

The testimony about whether the officers asked to come in to talk just because it was cold outside or because they wanted to ask questions in an investigation was unclear. Therefore, the court concludes that the government did not meet its burden of proof on voluntary consent. United States v. Zuniga-Leija, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118629 (D. Kan. July 28, 2017).

Defendant claimed that the affidavit for search warrant had falsities but doesn’t show them. There is probable cause otherwise, and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Pettway, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123574 (W.D. N.Y. June 21, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122838 (W.D. N.Y. Aug. 3, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.