OR: State’s inevitable discovery argument was speculative and rejected

The state’s argument that the finding of a used syringe and a “cooker” on him would have been found lawfully anyway during a patdown was based on speculation the court can’t accept. State v. Sigfridson, 287 Ore. App. 74, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 914 (July 26, 2017).

Defendant’s vehicle was subjected to a stop and a search on probable cause from a CI based on the automobile exception. United States v. Alicea, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113969 (D. Mass. July 21, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Inevitable discovery. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.