LA5: Presence of two felons justified protective sweep

Protective sweep under Buie was justified by belief there were two felons present. Plain view of gun was valid. State v. Hicks, 3 So. 3d 539 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008).*

Record supports the trial court’s conclusion defendant consented to the search of his car. People v. Visich, 57 A.D.3d 804, 870 N.Y.S.2d 376 (2d Dept. 2008).*

Officers watched defendant purchase psuedo three times and then he committed a traffic violation. PC for a search of the car was present by the plain view of the psuedo he saw on the dashboard. Vafaiyan v. State, 279 S.W.3d 374 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.