CA5: No QI immunity for arrest for videotaping police station; 1A claim was not well-settled at time of arrest, but it is now

Plaintiff was arrested in September 2015 for videotaping a Ft. Worth police station from across the street. They first asked him for identification which he refused to provide. Then they arrested him and left him in a hot police car with the windows up. A lieutenant came to the scene, talked to plaintiff and ordered him released. The case law at the time was sufficiently ambiguous that the officers get qualified immunity on plaintiff’s First Amendment claim, but the court goes ahead and makes it clear that, henceforth, plaintiff’s conduct was protected speech. On the question of the initial questioning, the officers get qualified immunity for that, too, to at least see what plaintiff was doing as to planning an attack or something [sort of like looking in a wallet for a bomb?]. As to his arrest and detention, however, they get no qualified immunity because there was no probable cause for the arrest, and they admitted it. The lieutenant gets qualified immunity [and shouldn’t have even been sued; he did end the matter]. Turner v. Driver, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2769 (5th Cir. Feb. 16, 2017).

See Techdirt: Appeals Court Says Filming The Police Is Protected By The First Amendment by Tim Cushing

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.