OH4 sanctions uncorroborated anonymous tip

Inventory search law does not require less intrusive measures be applied. Even so, there was no evidence that the defendant even requested that the vehicle go to his house, which was just blocks away. United States v. Sandifer, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80668 (S.D. Miss. August 11, 2008).*

Eyewitness called and gave her name. She was not an anonymous tipster. State v. Nowden, 2008 Ohio 5383, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 4529 (2d Dist. October 10, 2008):

[*P25] The call the police received was not an “anonymous tip” that lacked any apparent basis for the information the caller related. Adams v. Williams. The caller identified herself as Starlina Gevedon and gave a first-hand, eyewitness account of shootings that took place at a specific address. She also identified the shooter and the vehicle he used to drive away. That information provided the police agency a reasonable suspicion necessary for the stop of Defendant’s vehicle.

Anonymous informant’s tip was not corroborated, and there was no showing of reliability. But, the officer’s experience with this defendant’s drug trafficking history was sufficient to show probable cause. State v. Shepherd, 2008 Ohio 5355, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 4519 (4th Dist. September 26, 2008).* (Comment: This case borders on the pathetic. The anonymous informant can be corroborated by the officer’s experience? There is no a word in this opinion that protects against the possibility [probability?] that this informant does not even exist or that it was the informant version of what we jokingly referred to in the early 70’s as a “Mississippi Search Warrant”.FN1)

1. One cop goes to the front door and another goes to the back. The officer at the front door knocks and says: “Police; we want to talk to you.” The officer at the back door says: “Come on in.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.