911 hangup call justifies entry onto the curtilage

911 call is quintessentially an emergency that has to at least be checked out, and it justifies an entry onto the curtilage to go to the door. Nail v. Gutierrez, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80691 (N.D. Ind. October 10, 2008):

Dialing 911 is a common way to convey to the police that there is an emergency at hand. As the Seventh Circuit has noted:

A 911 call is one of the most common–and universally recognized–means through which police and other emergency personnel learn that there is someone in a dangerous situation who urgently needs help. This fits neatly with a central purpose of the exigent circumstances (or emergency) exception to the warrant requirement, namely, to ensure that the police or other government agents are able to assist persons in danger or otherwise in need of assistance.

United States v. Richardson, 208 F.3d 626, 630 (7th Cir. 2000). Anonymous 911 hangup calls often present an even higher need for police investigation. “Many 911 calls are brief, and anonymous, precisely because the speaker is at risk and must conceal the call. These persons are more rather than less in need of assistance.” United States v. Elder, 466 F.3d 1090, 1091 (7th Cir. 2006). Therefore, the fact that an anonymous 911 hangup was received from Nail’s residence more than justified entry onto his property for purposes of investigation. It is true, as Nail contends, that the 911 call could have been as benign as a child playing with the phone. But that possibility is not enough to quell the reasonable fear that an officer might have for occupants of the residence.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.