IL: Adult porn does not mean child porn is near

Finding of adult porn in defendant’s house is not reasonable suspicion to believe that child porn would be found on his computer. However, the computer use agreement he signed for probation permitted computer searches without reasonable suspicion, so the search was valid. People v. Thornburg, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 814 (2d Dist. August 12, 2008).*

Detaining the mailed package in this case was permissible under Van Leeuwen because of reasonable suspicion. United States v. Alexander, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17546, 2008 FED App. 0298P (6th Cir. August 18, 2008):

In this case, Detective Cook’s suspicion was reasonable. On this particular package, the signature was waived with an “X” mark, the package seemed “dense,” the label was handwritten, the package was coming from Las Vegas and going to Shaker Heights, and the return address was fictitious. Given these circumstances, we hold that there was sufficient evidence of criminal activity afoot to warrant detaining the package for further investigation. Alexander argues that the address may actually have been valid, and that Cook was mistaken. However, the fact that the return address may actually have been valid is irrelevant. “The reasonableness of an official invasion of the citizen’s privacy must be appraised on the basis of the facts as they existed at the time that invasion occurred.” Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 115. At the time he detained the package and subjected it to a dog sniff, Cook had made a reasonable effort to verify the address and received a report that it was fake. Thus, reasonable suspicion existed to justify detaining the package pending a dog sniff, which occurred within approximately twenty minutes of the time Cook first noticed the package.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.