CA: Defendant abandoned his motel room in flight from murder

Defendant was shown to have abandoned a motel room leaving various items behind. The motel manager attempted to contact defendant before entering hours after checkout time had passed. The door was locked, and it was apparent flight was out a window, breaking the screen. Various things were left behind, and defendant made no effort to contact the motel after he left and before arrest. People v. Parson, 44 Cal. 4th 332, 187 P.3d 1, 79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 269 (2008).*

Defendant waived his search claim in his guilty plea, and his waiver of 2255 IAC rights in the plea was binding. Nunez v. United States, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51688 (D. N.J. July 7, 2008):

The Court finds Petitioner’s § 2255 waiver enforceable. “[A] waiver does not become unenforceable simply because a defendant claims ineffective assistance, but only if the record of the criminal proceeding revealed that the claim that the waiver was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel was meritorious.” United States v. Akbar, 181 Fed. Appx. 283, 286-287 (2006) citing United States v. Monzon, 359 F.3d 110, 118-19 (2d Cir. 2004) (internal quotations omitted). However, Nunez does not claim that in his case, ineffectiveness of counsel resulted in his signing the waiver unknowingly, involuntarily, or with a lack of understanding. Rather, his ineffective counsel claim is premised upon counsel’s failure to appeal the denied motion to suppress evidence. As a result, Petitioner’s waiver of his § 2255 rights is effective, and his ineffective counsel claim does not survive waiver of appeal.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.