Housemates had apparent authority to consent to a common area of defendant’s house

Housemates had common authority to consent to a search of the common areas of defendant’s house. State v. Robinson, 986 So. 2d 716 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008)*; State v. Butt, 2008 Ohio 2587, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 2164 (2d Dist. May 30, 2008)*.

Defendant was stopped in a high crime area, and he was startled and acted nervous. That added up to reasonable suspicion. State v. Honeycutt, 987 So. 2d 250 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008), released for publication August 1, 2008*; State v. Huntley, 986 So. 2d 792 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008).*

Mistake of fact as to the purpose of the stop of the defendant for a malfunctioning light was not enough to void it because the lights looked like they were malfunctioning. United States v. McHugh, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42171 (E.D. Va. May 29, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.