9th Cir.: DNA testing of nonviolent drug offenders permissible

DNA can be taken from a person convicted of a non-violent drug conspiracy. United States v. Kriesel, 508 F.3d 941 (9th Cir. 2007) (2-1):

Kriesel counters that nonviolent offenders have lower recidivism rates than violent offenders. This argument is not persuasive in Kriesel’s case. Indeed, he is already a recidivist, as he violated the terms of his release when he tested positive for controlled substances. While it is true that “recidivism rates vary with factors like the offender’s age and type of conviction,” nonetheless, “the high likelihood that non-violent offenders will re-offend–and therefore, as the Supreme Court recognized in Knights, be put in the position to conceal their crimes and identities from the authorities–underscores the Government’s interest in obtaining the most accurate identification information it can from these individuals.” See Banks, 490 F.3d at 1191.

Comment: I lost this issue in Arkansas two years ago, Polston v. State, 360 Ark. 317, 201 S.W.3d 406 (2005), holding there is enough risk of recidivism even with drug offenders to justify it. See also Annots., Validity, Construction, and Application of DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 14135 et seq. and 10 U.S.C.A. § 1565, 187 A.L.R. Fed. 373, § 12 (larceny); Validity, construction, and operation of state DNA database statutes, 76 A.L.R.5th 239.

Coincidentally, the LAPD alone needs $9.5M to clear out its DNA backlog. See yesterday’s LATimes.com: LAPD far short of funds for DNA tests.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.