$900,000 verdict for arrest on invalid warrant was reversed because the warrant was facially valid

Plaintiff was awarded $900,000 and $545,973.50 in attorney fees and costs of $7,105.37 in a suit over a search warrant alleged to have been issued without probable cause. The appellate court found that the warrant was not facially invalid, and the officer was entitled to qualified immunity in any event, and the judgment for the plaintiff was reversed. Wood v. Emmerson, 155 Cal. App. 4th 1506, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 847 (4th Dist. 2007).*

The trial court ruled that the defendant was patted down without reasonable suspicion that he was armed. Even reasonable suspicion was iffy, because the defendant was cooperative and compliant and gave no reason to believe he was a danger to the officers. Affirmed. State v. Prevo, 2007 Ohio 5452, 2007 Ohio App. LEXIS 4789 (8th Dist. October 11, 2007).*

Defendant’s arrest under a Cleveland ordinance was unjustified under the ordinance, so the product of that arrest was properly suppressed. State v. Baker, 2007 Ohio 5450, 2007 Ohio App. LEXIS 4784 (8th Dist. October 11, 2007).*

Defendant was stopped next to a fire hydrant and an officer approached his car with a flashlight in hand, which revealed a handgun between the seats. Search for the handgun was valid. United States v. Fuller, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75403 (E.D. N.Y. October 10, 2007).*

Record supports the USMJ’s finding of reasonable suspicion. “The only new argument is found in defendant’s objection that the magistrate judge erred in finding that his circuitous, elusive and nebulous actions while driving his vehicle late at night on deserted city streets gave rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.” United States v. Howard, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75683 (E.D. Tex. October 10, 2007)* (classic Terry).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.