Defendant’s outstanding warrant for a violent crime justified frisk

Defendant’s frisk was justified because the officer found a warrant for the defendant for a violent crime, and that is the classic situation contemplated by Terry. United States v. Faison, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74573 (E.D. Pa. October 5, 2007).*

Officer had reasonable suspicion to patdown the defendant, and that led to lawful discovery of crack on the defendant. United States v. Johnson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74560 (E.D. Pa. October 5, 2007).*

An Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim does not implicate any Fourth Amendment claim. Corley v. Prator, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74599 (W.D. La. October 4, 2007).*

Plaintiff was naked and armed with a handgun, and there was a five hour standoff with police, and plaintiff was tasered when arrested and taken for a psyche eval. The officers were clearly entitled to qualified immunity for their actions in dealing with the plaintiff. Nero v. Baltimore County, 512 F. Supp. 2d 407 (D. Md. 2007).*

Officer who obtained search warrant for medical provider records had probable cause for seizure of the records at the time the warrant was issued, and that was fatal to plaintiffs’ civil claims under § 1983. Afreedi v. Devlin, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74676 (D. Mass. August 2, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.