GA: With rental car stops, looking at rental agreement is permitted

When a rental car is stopped for a traffic offense, the officer is permitted to inquire into whether the person driving is an authorized driver. In this case, from stop to finding cocaine with a drug dog because of vague answers, the stop was 5-7 minutes. Williams v. State, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 759 (November 14, 2014):

With regard to rental cars, examination of the rental agreements and any ensuing investigation are considered part of the traffic stop. See, e. g., Culpepper v. State, 312 Ga. App. 115, 120-121 (717 SE2d 698) (2011) (expired rental car agreement provided additional reason to detain driver); United States v. Collins, 2006 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 88631 at *12 (W. D. La. 2006) (officer entitled “to verify … that [defendant] was an authorized driver of the car” during traffic stop); People v. Grear, 232 AD2d 578, 579 (649 N.Y.S.2d 36) (Sup. Ct. N. Y. 1996) (“Since neither the driver nor the passenger was listed on the rental agreement, it was reasonable for the arresting officer to make further inquiry into the status of the rental car.[Cits.]”). “Normally, the stop ends when the police have no further need to control the scene, and inform the driver and passengers they are free to leave.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Rodriguez, supra, 295 Ga. at 371 n. 13 (2) (b). Accordingly, because the officer had not yet informed Williams that he was free to leave with the rental car or returned the rental agreement, the traffic stop was ongoing at the time the free-air canine search was performed.

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.