N.D.Ohio: A pretextual traffic stop can’t be used to remove a tracking device

The government doesn’t have the authority to have its officers simply stop a motorist under the guise of a traffic stop to remove a tracking device. Because tracking devices are always removed surreptitiously, there is no law on this anywhere. Inevitable discovery, however, leads to no suppression here because officers had search warrants for his house that would have led to probable cause to search or impound the car. United States v. Christian, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115651 (N.D. Ohio August 19, 2014).

After a heroin overdose death, officers got word on the location of the dealer. They went to that house and found baggies discarded in the yard that field tested positive for cocaine. The back door was open, and drug paraphernalia was in plain view in the kitchen. Officers entered and got consent to search the common areas. They did a protective sweep of the other rooms and woke up a couple and frisked them. Marijuana was in plain view on a nightstand. Then a search warrant was obtained. The entry and searches were not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Medina, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115575 (S.D. Fla. August 18, 2014).*

A warrant is not required to arrest on probable cause for a felony. The court says that this shouldn’t need explaining, but this is a pro se defendant. Commonwealth v. Dozier, 2014 PA Super 177, 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2869 (August 20, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, GPS / Tracking Data, Protective sweep. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.