N.D.W.Va.: Navarette doesn’t save this anonymous tip; seemingly even undermines it

The anonymous tip here that there would be a gun in the car defendant was in was not supported by objective facts of any sort. This was not a 911 call report, either, as in Navarette, and the court just isn’t crediting reasonable suspicion. A long explanation of both sides of the argument, and the mere fact of a gun in the car, in a concealed carry state, isn’t enough. United States v. Robinson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112382 (N.D. W.Va. August 8, 2014)*:

The Court notes that the above cited cases involve the veracity of a tip to support reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to justify a Terry stop. Based on the case law cited above, it is apparent that the tip in the present case, alone, is insufficient to support reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to allow for an investigative stop of Defendant’s vehicle because the activity reported, carrying and concealing a firearm, is not a crime in West Virginia. However, at issue in the present case is whether the anonymous tip supported a reasonable suspicion that Defendant was armed and dangerous to justify the Terry frisk for weapons. Similar to the Terry stop analyses above, the anonymous tip must not only be reliable, but must also contain some facts demonstrating an “objective manifestation” that the person to be frisked is armed and dangerous.

. . .

In this case, the content of the tip provided to the police, while reporting the individual was armed, does not contain any information demonstrating that the individual was engaging in any “objective or particularized” dangerous behavior. Officer Tharp testified that the information reported by the anonymous caller — that a person was in possession of and concealed a loaded firearm — was, in fact, not reporting a crime or any criminal activity. (Tr. 26—27). The anonymous tip provided no information indicating that the person observed in the parking lot was engaging in an illegal activity, making threats, brandishing the weapon or conducting himself in any manner that others would perceive as dangerous.7 Similarly, the anonymous tip did not include information regarding the caller’s familiarity with the man possessing the firearm indicating knowledge that he did not have a concealed carry permit or was not permitted to possess a firearm.

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.