DE: Out of possession landlord had no expectation of privacy in his rental property

“As an out of possession landlord and–subsequently–a former landlord, Mr. Walker would not have any expectation of privacy in any rental property he owned. That expectation of privacy would belong to the tenants at 637 Clymer Street. Further, Mr. Walker did not even own the property during the time in question.” Walker v. City of New Castle, 2014 Del. Super. LEXIS 307 (June 23, 2014).

Defendant consented to a search of his cell phone apparently as an act of cooperation. The district court did not clearly err in finding consent. United States v. Garrett, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12184 (7th Cir. June 26, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.