Warrant for drugs on the premises authorized opening a safe; defendant’s opening it was not coerced consent

Officers had a search warrant for drugs and found a safe in the premises. They induced the defendant to open it under threat of breaking into it. Consent is not an issue because the warrant authorized entry. United States v. Carlisle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46692 (N.D. Ind. June 26, 2007).

Police surveilled the defendant and had probable cause to believe that defendant and his car were involved in a crime. On his arrest, a search incident of the car validly led to seizure of a piece of paper with handwritten notations and a cellular phone SIM card. United States v. Tribble, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46920 (E.D. N.Y. June 28, 2007).

Defendant’s guilty plea and fact he would lose on merits cut off ineffective assistance claim. Washington v. United States, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46917 (W.D. Tex. June 28, 2007).*

Plaintiff’s arrest for breach of the peace after a neighbor’s 911 call about the occupants of his house being highly intoxicated and arguing was justified and summary judgment was granted. Engwer v. Sims, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46826 (D. S.C. June 26, 2007).*

Plaintiff’s delay in bringing his search claim until after his conviction was set aside was time barred because it was not facially barred by Heck. D’Angelo v. Kirschner, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46698 (D. Conn. June 26, 2007).*

The USMJ found that reasonable suspicion developed before the traffic ticket was issued, and defendant’s summary objection was insufficient to prevent adoption of the finding. United States v. Gooden, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46806 (E.D. N.C. June 26, 2007).*

Police called defendant’s probation officer who arrived at the scene of the arrest, and the probation officer conducted a valid search. Everett v. State, 2007 Del. LEXIS 282 (June 28, 2007).*

The police exceeded the permissible scope of a Terry search when, after searching and restraining the defendant, searching the vehicle he was driving, and calling a drug-sniffing dog to the scene to search for illegal drugs, they returned to the vehicle and conducted another search based on the same suspicion that justified the initial searches. The trial court erred when it failed to suppress as evidence a gun the police found during their last search of the vehicle. State v. Flowers, 734 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 2007).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.