Utah: Open container violation supports search incident

Open container violation justified a search incident to the arrest. State v. Gutierrez, 2007 UT App 196, 2007 Utah App. LEXIS 205 (June 7, 2007). (Comment: This is an issue that is state law dependent; i.e., does state law make it a citation offense or a mere violation or is it a misdemeanor?)

Officers were conducting a missing persons and drug investigation involving the defendant as a target. After a few months, the officers decided to do a trash pull on defendant’s house. Searching the trash revealed drug evidence, and that was used to get a search warrant for his house. No reasonable suspicion was required for the trash pull, despite language in another case where there was reasonable suspicion. Defendant failed to show that there was a sufficient privacy interest involved. Trial court’s suppression order reversed. State v. Stevens, 2007 SD 54, 734 N.W.2d 344 (2007), relying on State v. Schwartz, 2004 SD 123, P17, 689 NW2d 430, 435-36 (2004).*

Defendant’s stop in a convenience store was justified. Police received a 911 call about a man with a gun who was wanted, and they were dispatched to the store, and two men were found talking to each other who split up when they saw the officer. The officer believed that one passed a gun to the other, and he ordered them to put their hands on the counter. This was reasonable for officer safety. State v. Hendricks, 213 Ore. App. 360, 160 P.3d 1014 (2007).*

“Under Utah law, the odor of marijuana is enough to create a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity that justifies law enforcement’s brief detention of an individual for investigatory purposes.” Therefore, the defendant’s detention was reasonable. State v. Parkin, 2007 UT App 193, 2007 Utah App. LEXIS 206 (June 7, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.