KY: Landlord can’t consent. [Come on; this still comes up?]

Officers got permission to open a suspicious package from the sender and found marijuana. They took it to defendant’s house for a knock-and-talk, and got no answer. Defendant’s landlord unlocked and opened the door for the officers, and that entry violated the Fourth Amendment. Once inside, they claimed they could smell marijuana and claimed that as an exigent circumstance, but that was too late. Hall v. Commonwealth, 2014 Ky. App. LEXIS 6 (January 10, 2014). [Note: The question of landlords having no power to consent was settled 65 years ago. The more important question here should be: Why did the prosecutor even file this case? Slept through criminal procedure class? Apparently the judge did, too. I get it that the police maybe didn’t know, considering the minimal, almost nonexistent legal training on search and seizure they get, but that doesn’t excuse any of the law school and system trained legal professionals.]

Cooking heroin in the front seat of a car in a high crime area and then fleeing is reasonable suspicion. State v. Grefer, 2014-Ohio-51, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 46 (2d Dist. January 10, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.