IN: Officer violated curtilage serving civil protective order at back door

Officer serving a civil protective order violated curtilage by going to the back door and finding a marijuana grow. Jadrich v. State, 999 N.E.2d 1022 (Ind. App. 2013):

The State has failed to convince us that Deputy Butterfield’s purpose for being at Jadrich’s home—to serve a civil protective order—justified his foray into the back yard. The State points to no authority suggesting that the service of protective orders is a purpose that excuses police entry into areas that are otherwise constitutionally protected and off-limits. Likewise, our research has uncovered no such authority. Moreover, while we acknowledge that the service of protective orders is an important official function, there is no indication in the record of any emergency or special urgency particular to the order at issue here. The State has failed to establish that Deputy Butterfield was justified in entering Jadrich’s back yard, an area specifically designated as off-limits to visitors, which is where he was when he found the marijuana. Consequently, the trial court erred in admitting evidence regarding the marijuana found in Jadrich’s back yard. As the State acknowledged at oral argument, a conclusion that evidence regarding the marijuana was erroneously admitted leads necessarily to the conclusion that evidence regarding the smoking pipe was erroneously admitted as well. Without this evidence, [*24] both of Jadrich’s convictions are fatally undercut.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.