CA4: Occupy Columbia case can proceed; qualified immunity for arrest for protesting denied

South Carolina Occupy case goes forward; qualified immunity denied because plaintiffs alleged a violation of a clear constitutional right: The right to protest on state capitol grounds after 6 p.m. Occupy Columbia v. Haley, 13-1258 (4th Cir. December 16, 2013).

Officers had probable cause to believe defendant’s vehicle had evidence of sexual assault in it, and it was sufficient for the automobile exception that it was operational and movable. Defendant’s jurisdictional argument fails because a local deputy sheriff arrived before the search occurred. State v. Podrazo, 21 Neb. App. 489, 840 N.W.2d 898 (2013).*

The officer stopping and frisking defendant had reasonable suspicion he was involved in a robbery within the past 10 minutes and four blocks away. While there were other people similarly dressed in khaki pants, it was cold and only defendant had khaki shorts. Giving due deference to the experience of the officer [something that apparently tipped the balance], there is reasonable suspicion. United States v. Underwood, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176229 (E.D. Tenn. October 2, 2013),* adopted 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175297 (E.D. Tenn. December 13, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.