D.Minn.: Failure to allege a reasonable expectation of privacy in place searched or things seized fatal

Defendant moved to suppress, but he did not claim a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched or the things seized, so he cannot prevail. [Note I didn’t say “standing.”] United States v. Rogers, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173175 (D. Minn. August 29, 2013).*

One Beckman had possession of defendant’s cell phone and he showed child pornography pictures on it to a police officer who then took the phone for a search warrant. The initial seizure was private, and the showing to the police was not unreasonable. United States v. Rasmussen, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172437 (D. Minn. December 6, 2013),* R&R 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172880 (D. Minn. October 9, 2013).*

If the search in this case were based on inventory, defendant would win, but it can be justified by search incident and it’s valid. United States v. Vance, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172187 (E.D. Mo. November 7, 2013), adopted 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171493 (E.D. Mo., Dec. 5, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.