Officer’s holding paperwork of motorist is a detention; innocuous factors here added up to reasonable suspicion

Officers walked from lunch to a convenience store to talk to the defendants waiting there whom they had observed from the restaurant as having come from California (a “source state”). A consensual encounter ensued with conversation about the car and travel plans. Officers were formulating reasonable suspicion. Some of the factors were innocuous, but some were not. On the totality, all the information supported the inference that this was a drug run. The defendants were detained while the officers held the paperwork to the car. The officers handed back the paperwork and said they were free to go. Then, one stopped and turned back and asked for consent to search the car which he got. The consent was valid. United States v. Guerrero, 472 F.3d 784(10th Cir. 2007). Comment: This case is interesting in how the court analyzed factors under Arvizu and concluded that individual, potentially innocuous, factors pointed toward reasonable suspicion on the totality for the brief detention. The court credits one officer’s testimony that the differing stories from the occupants were consistent with the likelihood that two people who previously did not know each other were put together to drive the car with the drugs, a common technique of drug trafficking on the highways.

(Court today; more later.)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.