MT: Threats to officer after saying he’d get a SW admissible at trial

The officer told defendant he’d get a telephonic warrant for a blood draw, and defendant responded with threats to follow him home. They were admissible at trial. State v. Hardin, 2023 MT 132, 2023 Mont. LEXIS 701 (July 11, 2023).

Defendant’s motion for return of property fails for not being able to show a possessory interest in it. United States v. Hatter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117920 (N.D. Ala. May 24, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116836 (N.D. Ala. July 7, 2023).*

Defendant raised discovery of exculpatory material for the search warrant affidavit in discovery. He should file a motion to suppress instead. United States v. Githens, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117906 n.1 (E.D.Cal. July 10, 2023).*

“[A] petitioner may obtain habeas review of Fourth Amendment claims only if he establishes either that ‘“the state has provided no corrective procedures at all to redress the alleged fourth amendment violations,” or, “if the state has provided a corrective mechanism,” that the petitioner “was precluded from using that mechanism because of an unconscionable breakdown in the underlying process.”’” He fails on his Fourth Amendment habeas claim. Fuertes v. Gerbing, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117978 (E.D.N.Y. July 10, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.