A named CI arrested at the airport gave up defendant. The court finds the CI’s tale insufficient for probable cause for arrest, and the arrest and its fruits are suppressed. United States v. Duenas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91480 (D. Guam June 12, 2017).* Analyzing the proof:
Here, the first factor weighs in favor of the Government solely because Scully’s identity was known. See id. at 907-08. The second factor, however, weighs in favor of Duenas because there is no evidence that Scully provided reliable information in the past. See id. at 908. Additionally, the officers failed to verify information she provided regarding her purported previous travel to Guam. Thus, Scully was an “unproven informant” without any “track record of reliability.” See id.
The third factor weighs slightly in favor of the Government to the extent that she was the only basis of knowledge of the tip. See id. However, it is problematic because there is no evidence that the officers attempted to corroborate any information regarding the purported May 2016 drug transaction, such as checking flight or passport records prior to the arrest.
The fourth Rowland consideration weighs in favor of Duenas because Scully’s information regarding Duenas’ movements were not predictive. Rather, Duenas was contemporaneously told by the officers and Scully to meet at the Hotel Santa Fe. Meeting an individual at a hotel as directed by text message, without more, could be considered an “innocent” rather than “suspicious” activity.” See id.
As to the final factor, however, Scully may have had motive to fabricate the tip. See id. Scully was intercepted at the Airport, and her tip may have been an attempt to lessen her culpability. The court would normally consider this factor to be neutral because despite Scully’s motive to fabricate, she could be held accountable for false information. The court notes, however, that Officer Gutierrez observed Scully’s eyes to be glassy. This could be indicative of her being under the influence of narcotics. Consequently, this factor weighs against Scully’s reliability and in favor of Duenas.
When these factors are considered, Scully was not sufficiently reliable for the officers to conduct a warrantless arrest of Duenas in the absence of a controlled delivery. Even though Scully told the officers she had delivered methamphetamine to Duenas in the past, none of the texts explicitly referenced drugs. See Gov.’s Ex. 1. There is reference in the text messages to a “guy” who “has 7.” Even if this is coded language for illegal activity, it is unclear and does not arise to the level of probable cause necessary to conduct a full-blown arrest. See United States v. Mayorquin, No. CR 12-1076-CAS, 2013 WL 5405704, at *3-4 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 20, 2013) (concluding that phone calls referencing “seven shirts” and “six little dolls” with respect to a narcotics trafficking coupled with the officer’s observation of black bag being placed in defendant’s vehicle established reasonable suspicion, but stopping short of determining probable cause was present). Unlike cases where the Ninth Circuit has determined “coded” conversations could contribute to a finding of probable cause, the Government in this case did not present an affidavit by any officer providing interpretations of purportedly “coded” conversations. See United States v. Beltran, 11 F. App’x 786, 787 (9th Cir. 2001), as amended on denial of reh’g (May 30, 2001). Moreover, unlike Beltran, this case did not involve any ongoing investigation. See id.; see also United States v. Freeman, 498 F.3d 893, 902 (9th Cir. 2007) (observing that an officer “may provide [lay] opinion testimony regarding meaning of vague or ambiguous statements” if the lay opinion is “rationally based on the perception of the witness.” (citations omitted)).
Additionally, even though the officers testified that they were able to identify Duenas from his Facebook profile and description of his vehicle, the Government has failed to articulate how arranging to pick up or meet Scully at the hotel is indicative of criminal activity. The Government has not shown what contraband or evidence of a crime they believed was present on Duenas’ person or in Duenas’ vehicle. There were no incriminating statements by Duenas in the text messages he sent to Scully, no evidence presented of an ongoing criminal investigation of Duenas, and no evidence that a Department of Motor Vehicle return was executed showing that Duenas had a criminal record.
by John Wesley Hall
Criminal Defense Lawyer and
Search and seizure law consultant
Little Rock, Arkansas
Contact: forhall @ aol.com / The Book www.johnwesleyhall.com
"If it was easy, everybody would be doing it. It isn't, and they don't." —Me
"Life is not a matter of holding good cards, but of playing a poor hand well." –Josh Billings (pseudonym of Henry Wheeler Shaw), Josh Billings on Ice, and Other Things (1868) (erroneously attributed to Robert Louis Stevenson, among others)
“I am still learning.” —Domenico Giuntalodi (but misattributed to Michelangelo Buonarroti (common phrase throughout 1500's)).
"Love work; hate mastery over others; and avoid intimacy with the government."
—Shemaya, in the Thalmud
"It is a pleasant world we live in, sir, a very pleasant world. There are bad people in it, Mr. Richard, but if there were no bad people, there would be no good lawyers."
—Charles Dickens, “The Old Curiosity Shop ... With a Frontispiece. From a Painting by Geo. Cattermole, Etc.” 255 (1848)
"A system of law that not only makes certain conduct criminal, but also lays down rules for the conduct of the authorities, often becomes complex in its application to individual cases, and will from time to time produce imperfect results, especially if one's attention is confined to the particular case at bar. Some criminals do go free because of the necessity of keeping government and its servants in their place. That is one of the costs of having and enforcing a Bill of Rights. This country is built on the assumption that the cost is worth paying, and that in the long run we are all both freer and safer if the Constitution is strictly enforced."
—Williams
v. Nix, 700 F. 2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1983) (Richard Sheppard Arnold,
J.), rev'd Nix v. Williams, 467 US. 431 (1984).
"The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws,
or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence." —Mapp
v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961).
"Any costs the exclusionary rule are costs imposed directly by the Fourth Amendment."
—Yale Kamisar, 86 Mich.L.Rev. 1, 36 n. 151 (1987).
"There have been powerful hydraulic pressures throughout our history that
bear heavily on the Court to water down constitutional guarantees and give the
police the upper hand. That hydraulic pressure has probably never been greater
than it is today."
— Terry
v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 39 (1968) (Douglas, J., dissenting).
"The great end, for which men entered into society, was to secure their
property."
—Entick
v. Carrington, 19 How.St.Tr. 1029, 1066, 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (C.P. 1765)
"It is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have
frequently been forged in controversies involving not very nice people. And
so, while we are concerned here with a shabby defrauder, we must deal with his
case in the context of what are really the great themes expressed by the Fourth
Amendment."
—United
States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 69 (1950) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting)
"The course of true law pertaining to searches and seizures, as enunciated
here, has not–to put it mildly–run smooth."
—Chapman
v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 618 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., concurring).
"A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the
bottom of a turntable."
—Arizona
v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 325 (1987)
"For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly
exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth
Amendment protection. ... But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in
an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected."
—Katz
v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967)
“Experience should teach us to be most on guard to
protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born
to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded
rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men
of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
—United
States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438, 479 (1925) (Brandeis, J., dissenting)
“Liberty—the freedom from unwarranted
intrusion by government—is as easily lost through insistent nibbles by
government officials who seek to do their jobs too well as by those whose purpose
it is to oppress; the piranha can be as deadly as the shark.”
—United
States v. $124,570, 873 F.2d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir. 1989)
"You can't always get what you want /
But if you try sometimes / You just might find / You get what you need."
—Mick Jagger & Keith Richards
"In Germany, they first came for the communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for
the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Catholic. Then they came
for me–and by that time there was nobody left to speak up."
—Martin Niemöller (1945) [he served seven years in a concentration
camp]
“You know, most men would get discouraged by
now. Fortunately for you, I am not most men!”
---Pepé Le Pew
"The point of the Fourth Amendment, which often is not grasped by zealous officers,
is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which
reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that
those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being
judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting
out crime."
—Johnson
v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 13-14 (1948)