Bringing defendant back to scene of search did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights; he gave up combination to a safe

Defendant’s house was about to be searched with a search warrant when he drove off, and a marked car was used to stop him and bring him back to the scene of the search where he gave up the combination to a safe that the officers would have broken open if he didn’t give it up. The search was lawful. Rochon v. State, 2008 OK CR 1, 176 P.3d 362 (2008). (Comment: To me, it is hardly a violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights to get the combination to the safe from the defendant to avoid having to break it open. The alternative for him is worse, but he can always disavow the safe and let them break in. The defendant would be entitled to a Miranda warning before giving up the combination, however, because it would be an admission of knowledge of the contents of the safe.)

Officers arrived in two cars in “full code” for a “fight in progress” based on a 911 call but found a crowd and no fight. Defendant was in a car parked nearby, and he got out of his car and walked over to see what was going on. The officers turned their questioning to him and he was not free to leave while the questioning was going on, and there was no reasonable suspicion for continued questioning. State v. Willoughby, 2008 Ida. App. LEXIS 5 (January 8, 2008).*

Search incident and exigent circumstances justified taking of blood sample from defendant at the scene of an accident where he struck an officer who was on foot. His behavior at the scene justified his arrest. Vaughn v. State, 972 So. 2d 56 (Miss. App. 2008).* (Comment: The Mississippi courts website still has no 2008 cases online.)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.