D.Me.: Discovery under Florida v. Harris is of the dog, not the handler

Under Florida v. Harris, the defense gets discovery of the dog at issue, not other dogs handled by the same handler. United States v. White, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152019 (D. Me. October 22, 2013).

A frisk was justified by a movement at the waist and the sound of something metal hitting the ground. United States v. Starkie, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152319 (W.D. N.C. September 30, 2013).*

While defendant was in custody in the police car, the search of the car was justified by inventory or probable cause to believe evidence would be found. United States v. Swallows, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152651 (E.D. Tenn. October 24, 2013).*

Girlfriend’s consent to search by her probation officer was complete and to the whole premises. Bivens action properly dismissed. Dunn v. Mattivi, 535 Fed. Appx. 535 (8th Cir. 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.