CA9: On denial of rehearing, suspicionless probation search was valid

On rehearing, a panel of the Ninth Circuit reaffirms its decision on a probation search, but a dissent was added. United States v. King, 736 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2013), amended August 27, 2013. Summary by the court:

The panel amended a March 8, 2013, opinion [711 F.3d 986] affirming a conviction, and the court denied a petition for rehearing en banc, in a case involving whether the Fourth Amendment permits a suspicionless search of a probationer’s residence.

In the amended opinion, the panel held that a suspicionless search, conducted pursuant to a suspicionless-search condition of a violent felon’s probation agreement, does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Dissenting, Judge Berzon wrote that the majority does not give appropriate weight to the particular language in the defendant’s search condition and to the Supreme Court’s holdings that probationers have greater expectations of privacy than parolees.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.