AZ: Plain smell applies to a backpack on the person

Defendant was stopped in a high crime area on a bicycle at night with no light. He was nervous and couldn’t account for his possession of the backpack he had. It was reasonable then to separate him from the backpack for safety reasons when the officers patted him down. The officers then had plain smell of marijuana from the backpack for its search. State v. Baggett, 664 Ariz. Adv. Rep.17, 306 P.3d 81 (2013).

Officers had a search warrant for a cell phone that was alleged to have images of child pornography on them. Defendant was questioned but not in custody when he admitted to having images of child pornography on his cell phone. United States v. Conder, 529 Fed. Appx. 618 (6th Cir. 2013).*

Defendant’s stop for potential traffic violations was without reasonable suspicion, and nothing specific can be identified. Suppressed. State v. Stanley, 2013 Iowa App. LEXIS 741 (July 10, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.