CA3: School bus driver reasonably subject to random drug testing under the special needs doctrine

A school bus driver was reasonably subject to random drug testing under the special needs doctrine. Freeman v. Middle Twp. Bd. of Educ., 529 Fed. Appx. 213 (3d Cir. 2013).

An order of protection was issued against the defendant, including an order to relinquish firearms, and state officers who came to serve it can collect his guns. They collected a short barreled shotgun. Officers came back to talk to him about it, and made clear that he was not being arrested and was not in custody. Defendant did not have to let the officers into his place to talk about the court order, but he did. The seizure of the gun was reasonable under the state court order. Alternatively, it was in plain view. United States v. Gamache, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92125 (D. Me. May 23, 2013).

Defendant’s stop for a cracked taillight that emitted both red and white light was not a violation of Florida law. The stop was based on a mistake of law and was unreasonable. United States v. Harris, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92858 (N.D. Fla. July 2, 2013).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.