W.D.Okla.: Without standing, a Franks claim is moot

A pharmacy had a contract with an Indian tribe and operated on tribal lands. An investigation was opened for selling some drugs without a proper prescription, and its dumpster was searched. A search warrant for patient records was obtained, and the court found that the pharmacy lacked an expectation of privacy in the records. With no standing, the Franks claim was moot and did not have to be decided, citing United States v. Mastromatteo, 538 F.3d 535, 544 (6th Cir. 2008). United States v. Williams, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104295 (W.D. Okla. September 14, 2011).*

Defendant could be arrested for no driver’s license under Missouri law. His admission that there was a meth pipe in the car was probable cause to search it under the automobile exception. United States v. Brown, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104187 (W.D. Mo. August 24, 2011).*

“[P]etitioner has not demonstrated that [defense counsel] failed to file a meritorious claim. Any motion to suppress evidence based upon a lack of probable cause would have been frivolous.” Mitchell v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104027 (W.D. Wash. August 3, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.