NY Kings Co.: Court order for DNA to connect defendant to gun would not be granted where there was not a strong enough showing

Request for an order for a DNA swab from the defendant to attempt to connect him to two guns found in a house that he exited just before the police were directed to the guns was denied. There was enough genetic material on the guns to attempt to connect them to somebody, but there was no “clear indication” it would connect defendant to them under Matter of Abe A. Defendant dropped marijuana when he came out as it was. People v Washington, 2011 NY Slip Op 21311, 33 Misc. 3d 640, 929 N.Y.S.2d 432 (Crim.Ct. Kings Co. 2011):

In delineating the Fourth Amendment safeguards afforded the defendant in the case before it, this court adheres to the principle that a formal charge for commission of a crime is not a prerequisite to making the defendant available for DNA oral swabbing. As the Court stated in Matter of Abe A., “[w]e can find no case in which a court of general jurisdiction has been held to be without power to authorize a seizure or a search until a suspect is arrested and actually charged with a crime (cf. Zurcher v. Standford Daily, 436 U.S. 547 …).: Id. at 296.

Charged with a crime or not, probable cause is one pivotal factor that spearheads a court’s determination to acquiesce defendant’s constitutional right to be free of bodily intrusion when delicately balanced against circumstances the People insist call for intrusion of the defendant’s body to provide DNA samples.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.