D.Minn.: Knock-and-talk led to valid consent to look at computer in child porn case

ICE came to defendant’s house in a child pornography investigation after finding that an email from his address had sent child porn to another computer. They came in blue jeans with no visible weapons and conducted a knock-and-talk. They told defendant what they knew and asked for consent to search his computers. He agreed to a search and signed a consent form. The consent was valid. United States v. Olson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75866 (D. Minn. June 8, 2011).* [Since it is possible for others to hack into one’s wifi network, that is at least a defense, except when the defendant consents and the CP is found on his computer.]

Police came to defendant’s house about a gun having been fired. He invited them in to see the gun, and they saw guns in plain view while looking for the gun. The entry was voluntary, and the plain view was reasonable. State v. Austin, 310 Ga. App. 814, 714 S.E.2d 671 (2011).*

This Franks challenge fails because the officer was found credible on the omission, and, in any event, it is immaterial to the probable cause determination. United States v. Waters, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75908 (E.D. Pa. July 14, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.