S.D.Ga.: Telling the defendant to essentially stay put while his DL was checked for wants or warrants did not turn a consensual encounter into a seizure

Telling the defendant to essentially stay put while his DL was checked for wants or warrants did not turn a consensual encounter into a Fourth Amendment seizure. United States v. Lowe, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74637 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2011).*

Defense counsel’s failure to move to suppress the search of defendant’s house would not have changed the outcome because the bulk of the evidence came from his car, which he did not challenge. United States v. Perez, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74506 (E.D. Pa. July 11, 2011).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion for a stop for defendant being in possession of drugs, but he also crossed the fog line three times while being followed. He was stopped and given a field sobriety test. In the meantime, a drug dog arrived and alerted, and that gave probable cause to search the car. The four minutes between the stop and the arrest was not unreasonably long. United States v. Sicairos-Sicairos, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74557 (N.D. Ga. July 11, 2011), R&R 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74556 (N.D. Ga. June 20, 2011).*

Defendant previously litigated the search warrant in his case as an outrageous governmental conduct claim, not a Fourth Amendment claim. Thus, it is defaulted as a Fourth Amendment claim in his 2255. United States v. Holler, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74139 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.