CA5: Immigration checkpoint questioning was based on RS

At an immigration checkpoint, the defendant refused to look at the officer questioning his seatmate. Defendant was traveling alone without luggage and said he had clothes in Austin but his DL said he lived in Brownsville. The officer had reasonable suspicion. The defendant consented to further detention and methamphetamine was found in his shoes. United States v. Lopez, 428 Fed. Appx. 376 (5th Cir. 2011) (unpublished):

The Supreme Court, however, has upheld the constitutionality of suspicionless searches at permanent immigration checkpoints like the one involved in this case. See United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 566, 96 S. Ct. 3074, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1116 (1976); see also United States v. Moreno-Vargas, 315 F.3d 489, 490 (5th Cir. 2002). Border Patrol agents stationed at a permanent checkpoint may stop a vehicle, question its occupants about their citizenship, and conduct a visual inspection of the vehicle without any individualized suspicion that the vehicle or its occupants are involved in a crime. See Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. at 558-61. This rule applies equally to commercial buses. See Portillo-Aguirre, 311 F.3d at 652; United States v. Ventura, 447 F.3d 375 (5th Cir. 2006).

The first case to apply Davis and Belton-Gant good faith. United States v. Caudle, 430 Fed. Appx. 809 (11th Cir. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.