VA: Passenger being IDd by computer as likely armed and with drug history justified frisk

Defendant was the passenger in a car lawfully stopped for a traffic offense. When his name was run, he came back as somebody who was likely armed and with a drug past. That justified his frisk. Commonwealth v. Smith, 281 Va. 582 (2011):

In the context of a traffic stop in which multiple individuals were present in the vehicle, the officer’s knowledge of the driver’s, or the occupants’, prior criminal history is highly relevant in determining whether the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat down for his or her safety, particularly when that prior criminal history included weapons and dangerous narcotics violations. In this case, after conducting a valid traffic stop, Officers Hedman and Moore were alerted via the … system that Smith was “probably armed and a narcotics seller/user.” We agree with the Court of Appeals that the knowledge of the officers who entered the criminal history into the PISTOL system is imputed to Officers Hedman and Moore for purposes of assessing whether they had reasonable suspicion to frisk Smith. Smith v. Commonwealth, 55 Va. App. 30, 42-43, 683 S.E.2d 316, 322-23 (2009); see also United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221, 229-33, 105 S. Ct. 675, 83 L. Ed. 2d 604 (1985).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.