MO: Conflict of laws: Illinois Genetic Privacy Act does not apply in Missouri murder prosecution

DNA taken in Illinois of a prison inmate doing time for a murder was not inadmissible in Missouri in a cold-case murder prosecution. The Illinois Genetic Privacy Act does not govern—the Fourth Amendment does, and the Fourth Amendment was not violated. State v. Bowman, 337 S.W.3d 679 (Mo. 2011):

Illinois Genetic Privacy Act

Bowman argues that the IGPA, 410 ILCS 513, restricts law enforcement from using information generated in a criminal investigation to investigate a separate crime. Bowman concludes that the IGPA extends the right of privacy and protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments by further restricting when genetic information can be released.

Bowman’s argument fails because state law privacy protections do not extend the protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment as applied to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment. For instance, in Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 171-174, 128 S. Ct. 1598, 170 L. Ed. 2d 559 (2007), the Court held that violation of a Virginia state law pertaining to the legality of an arrest did not impact the constitutional analysis of the reasonableness of the search incident to the arrest. Likewise, even if the IGPA barred the sharing of genetic information in unrelated criminal cases, a violation of those provisions would not support a finding that a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.