E.D.Pa.: Firearms and drugs are likely kept at a drug dealer’s house

The CI’s detailed information about guns and drugs supported the search warrant for defendant’s house just because those things would logically be found there. United States v. Colon, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38577 (E.D. Pa. April 7, 2011):

The Third Circuit has consistently held that it may readily be inferred that drug dealers conceal evidence in residences to which they have access:

… [E]vidence associated with drug dealing needs to be stored somewhere, and … a dealer will have the opportunity to conceal it in his home. After all, a dealer logically could conclude that his residence is the best, and probably the only, location to store items such as records of illicit activity, phone books, address books, large amounts of cash, assets purchased with proceeds of drug transactions, guns to protect drugs and cash, and large quantities of drugs to be sold.

Whitner, 219 F.3d at 298 (3d Cir. 2000); …

Defendant had surreptitiously recorded a minor in the nude in his bathroom a couple of years earlier, and the minor found out about it. She told others and finally the police. The defendant was known to be depressed and a potential suicide risk. Officers opted for a knock-and-talk rather than a search warrant because of the age of the information [that has never been a problem in a child pornography case]. The knock-and-talk is recounted in detail, including defendant’s hyperventilating at one point with an EMT being called, but he recovered and agreed to keep talking. He admitted to having child porn on his computer and then consented. United States v. Hughes, 640 F.3d 428 (1st Cir. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.