OR: A dog’s alert to what might be residual odor of drugs is still PC

Even though a drug dog may alert to the residual odor of drugs, that does not undermine probable cause for a search from a dog alert. State v. Foster, 350 Ore. 161, 252 P.3d 292 (2011); State v. Helzer, 350 Ore. 153, 252 P.3d 288 (2011).

Defendant’s guilty plea belied his claim of IAC. He also included a claim that his lawyer never moved to suppress evidence but never showed that it would be granted. Smith v. United States, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37444 (E.D. Mo. April 6, 2011).*

Defendants were stopped on I-40 in Oklahoma for impeding traffic for driving 64 in the left lane when the speed limit was 70, and they were passed by at least ten vehicles on the right. When they were stopped, the officer could smell marijuana, and they were excessively nervous and their stories were inconsistent. That was reasonable suspicion to detain them longer. United States v. McLaughlin, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37656 (W.D. Okla. April 6, 2011).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion to detain the defendants after a stop, and one defendant consented to a search of his person. United States v. Royal, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37833 (E.D. Tenn. April 6, 2011), R&R 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37655 (E.D. Tenn. March 4, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.