“More boondoggle than bonanza: Southbound checkpoints face Fourth Amendment challenges”

On Grits for Breakfast yesterday: More boondoggle than bonanza: Southbound checkpoints face Fourth Amendment challenges, about proposed Texas legislation for using checkpoints as revenue generators, hoping to cut into Mexican drug cartel profits:

Rob Kepple of the Texas District and County Attorneys Association told the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee that, under existing Fourth Amendment jurisprudence in Texas, it’s “not a viable policy” to use southbound checkpoints to “bootstrap our way” into expanded asset seizures or to check immigration status. Ouch!

The most problematic question, said Kepple is whether DPS can do its own checkpoints aimed at searching for money, guns, drugs, stolen cars, etc., as opposed to checking for drivers licenses and liability insurance? Courts look at the intent of the checkpoint, he said, and if the intent is to generate forfeiture revenue that probably won’t cut it.

[Note: for some reason, my software isn’t letting me imbed a link, so search for “grits for breakfast”]

At last, a DA who was willing to adhere to the Fourth Amendment. Over in Florida, the Governor wants to drug test everybody who works for or gets money from the state, obviously oblivious to the Fourth Amendment issues and the cost. The DAs are silent because it is not yet a criminal justice issue. Nobody else is silent, however, because there have been dozens of articles and blog posts about it, and I haven’t bothered to link to any others. OK, here’s Mother Jones‘s.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.