FL2 reaffirms that a search warrant is not required for pharmacy records

FL2 reaffirms (State v. Tamulonis, 39 So. 3d 524, 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), cert. denied, No. SC10-1539, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 80 (Fla. Jan. 3, 2011)) that there is no right to a search warrant to obtain defendant’s pharmacy records in a drug investigation. State v. Albritton, 58 So. 3d 894 (Fla. App. 2d DCA 2011).*

A drug dog alerted on defendant’s car, but the drug search proved futile. “Here, the Court concludes that the troopers had probable cause to search the entire truck, including the toolbox. Thus, the cash and documentary evidence contained inside Defendant’s vehicle was properly seized and should be upheld.” United States v. Vaughan, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20277 (M.D. Tenn. February 28, 2011).*

Officer’s mistake of law that a license plate frame could not cover words at the bottom of the license plate justified suppression of the evidence from the arrest. Also, in Massachusetts, when a stop is based on a statute or regulation that is alleged to be void, a motion to dismiss should be filed, not a motion to suppress, but this one can proceed. Commonwealth v. Miller, 78 Mass. App. Ct. 860, 944 N.E.2d 179 (2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.