D.S.D.: Plaintiff’s claim of unnecessary strip and body cavity search gets to go to a jury

A fact question for trial was shown as to whether plaintiff’s strip search because she was detained because of an open container violation occurred in the car in which she was riding was necessary. She was strip searched before she went to the bathroom, and the male detainees with her weren’t. Moreover, her body cavity search would be unconstitutional if her allegations are believed by a jury. Lucero v. Bush, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90921 (D. S.D. September 1, 2010).*

The CI’s information corroborated by the officers’ surveillance was sufficient to support issuance of the search warrant. United States v. Powell, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91278 (E.D. Mich. September 2, 2010).*

Officer’s observation of a gun and drugs through the car window was justification for search of the car. The defendant’s car was not even stopped by the officer; it was in a strip club parking lot when the officer approached to talk to them. United States v. Johnson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91489 (N.D. Ind. September 2, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.