WI: Good faith exception saves pre-Gant search

Defendant’s locked car was subjected to a search incident that would be invalid under Gant, but the court holds the good faith exception applies to a pre-Gant search incident. State v. Dearborn, 2010 WI 84, 327 Wis. 2d 252, 786 N.W.2d 97 (2010), affg 2008 WI App 131, 313 Wis. 2d 767, 758 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App. 2008):

[*P44] We can find no principled way to distinguish Krull or Ward from this case. Both this court and the United States Supreme Court have determined that the retroactivity rule does not bar application of the good faith exception in situations where police act in objectively reasonable reliance on settled (albeit subsequently overruled) law. As we have already explained, the officers were following the clear and settled precedent of this court; this is exactly what officers should do. Application of the exclusionary rule would have absolutely no deterrent effect on officer misconduct, while at the same time coming with the cost of allowing evidence of wrongdoing to be excluded. In short, under Krull or Ward, it is clear that applying the exclusionary rule would be an inappropriate remedy for the constitutional violations here.

How the court could reasonably conclude that the search incident doctrine applies to a locked car when the defendant is locked in a police car escapes me before Gant, and that kind of holding was what led to Gant. That isn’t good faith.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.