NY2: Rental property inspection does not require a Fourth Amendment violation

Rental property inspection statutes does not require an unreasonable search. If the owner does not consent, the inspectors have to get a search warrant. People v Laroche, 2010 NY Slip Op 20142, 27 Misc. 3d 97, 902 N.Y.S.2d 878 (2d Dept. 2010):

Defendant argues that North Hempstead Town Code § 2-103 — which makes it unlawful for the owner of a dwelling to permit the occupancy of such dwelling as a rental without having a valid permit to do so — is unconstitutional because it requires a property owner to submit to a warrantless search of his or her property. However, since North Hempstead Town Code § 2-110 provides for the inspection of residential dwellings upon consent and pursuant to a warrant, North Hempstead Town Code § 2-103 does not compel a residential property owner to consent to a warrantless search and is not unconstitutional (see Pashcow v Town of Babylon, 53 NY2d 687, 688 [1981]).

Contraband in defendant’s outbuilding was not in plain view. The outbuilding was on the curtilage, and the entry was unreasonable. Consent was not voluntary, and inevitable discovery did not apply because the contraband was part of the decision to get a warrant. State v. Bradford, 2010 Ohio 1784, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 1476 (4th Dist. April 19, 2010).*

The state’s argument defendant lacked standing was not raised until a motion to reconsider, so it is waived. However, on the merits, there was a reasonable probability if defense counsel filed a motion to suppress, it might have succeeded, so defense counsel was arguably ineffective, and the evidence supports the trial court’s findings. Kolle v. State, 386 S.C. 578, 690 S.E.2d 73 (2010). [Note: I can’t help but note that cases on similar facts result in the search being sustained, anyway. Here, the issue was an entry on exigent circumstances. Police responded to a loud music complaint, the door looked like it had been broken open, and nobody responded to the door. The officers entered to look for possible incapacitated persons and conducted a protective sweep.]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.