N.D.Iowa: Faulure to provide attachment for particularity limits not deliberate so no suppression

Officers executing search warrant gave defendant a copy of the warrant but without the particularity attachment, so he argued Groh v. Ramirez and Rule 41(f)(1)(C) were violated. The executing officers had the full warrant. The court found this not deliberate and not warranting suppression of evidence. United States v. Riesselman, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32183 (N.D. Iowa March 31, 2010):

However, numerous courts, including the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, have held that this type of violation of Rule 41 does not mandate suppression unless “a defendant is prejudiced or if reckless disregard of proper procedure is evident.” United States v. Spencer, 439 F.3d 905 (8th Cir. 2006) (citing United States v. Bieri, 21 F.3d 811, 816 (8th Cir. 1994)); see, e.g., United States v. Gantt, 194 F.3d 987, 993, 994 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing cases from the First, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits). “Not all violations of this type of rule require the suppression of evidence; we have said that innocent mistakes that do not prejudice the defendant may be excused.” United States v. Zacher, 465 F.3d 336, 339 (8th Cir. 2006) (citing United States v. Schroeder, 129 F.3d 439, 443-44 (8th Cir. 1997); United States v. Burgard, 551 F.2d 190, 193 (8th Cir. 1997)). Here, Jones had a complete copy of the warrant with him, including Attachment 1. Had Riesselman inquired about the absence of Attachment 1, and asked to see it, his request undoubtedly would have been granted, and Jones would have discovered his error in failing to provide Riesselman with a copy of Attachment 1.

There is no evidence that the officers’ failure to give a copy of Attachment 1 to Riesselman was deliberate. Further, Riesselman has failed to show he was prejudiced. Therefore, Riesselman’s motion to suppress the fruits of the search should be denied.

Rule 41(f)(1)(C):

(f) Executing and Returning the Warrant.
(1) Warrant to Search for and Seize a Person or Property.
(A) Noting the Time. …
(B) Inventory. …
(C) Receipt. The officer executing the warrant must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken or leave a copy of the warrant and receipt at the place where the officer took the property.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.